Over the past 20 years I have been involved in a number of businesses many in various stages of turnarounds. I have seen or executed both successful and unsuccessful turnarounds. Often the failures taught me more than successes did. By sharing this methodology and lessons learned I hope to make it easier for today’s leaders to tackle such situations. [AY1]
I am sharing a simple process that analyzes profitability of products, and lays out
specific steps to improve profitability through a combination of culling,
margin improvement and volume growth.
The paradox of too much volume
Often
sites or companies are in a difficult situation where no matter how much they
increase the volume their profits do not go up. Reducing fixed costs also has
little effect. The company is also short on availability of working capital.
This results in either high cost of borrowing money for working capital or not
having enough cash to fund safety inventory to enable smooth operations.
To
identify if we have a margin spread problem, we start with a product
profitability analysis. This example is for a manufacturing business. It can be
applied to service delivery business as well except a majority of the costs
will be for labor. For those who are unaccustomed to the financial terms please
refer to the Profitability Basics and Glossary section at the end of the blog.
Collecting the necessary data
For
an accurate analysis it is important to have good data. Most accounting systems
(if kept up) should have this data that the company or site accounting or
business finance group should be able to provide. You can typically use the
last twelve month of data or a more recent period (say last 2 quarters) if
there has been a big change in profitability. Specifically:
Volume and Price of products sold
Revenue from products
Actual raw material consumed per unit of product (not standard but from usage)
Average raw material cost (RMC)
Variable labor allocated for each unit of
product
Labor rate fully burdened
Total plant or allocated fixed
costs for the line
Analyzing the data for
profitability
The
first test of profitability is: Are we generating sufficient variable margin to
cover the fixed costs? Let us say the plant produces 6 different products with
varying variable margin as in Table I below:
Table 1: Initial data set for profitability analysis
We do some
data manipulation calculating variable margin generated by each product and
also calculating VM % or Variable Margin as a % of Revenue. As long as the cumulative variable margin (18,700) is greater than the plant fixed costs the business should have positive gross margin. For the business to be truly profitable the gross margin should exceed the SG&A expenses. Next we sort the
data with descending order of variable margin%.
Table
2: Re-sorted data with cum.
margin and volume
Note the entire data set is sorted with VM% as the key, declining
from 23% to -31%. We next calculate the cumulative volume and cumulative Variable
Margin and plot Cumulative Variable Margin vs. Cumulative Volume. The results
are show in Fig. 1.
The variable margin to volume curve can be divided into three
sections.
Section A is the healthy margin section. With increase in
volume variable margin goes up. So by bringing additional volume you will
generate additional variable margin thus covering more of your fixed costs.
Section B is the low to flat growth section. With every
additional volume you get very little increase in variable margin. While the
overall impact of these products is positive given the low variable margin
these products are not very attractive.
Section C is the negative variable margin section. The
products do not have positive variable margin and you lose more money as you
sell more. These products are the biggest opportunity for improving overall
profitability of the business.
Key actions to
improve profitability
Now that we have identified the profitability of various products and ‘leakage’ of profits due to certain products, it is time to deal with the ‘problem children.’
Fix or fire the underperformers
There are two ways to deal with these types of products (section C). Either you raise prices, or if customers are not willing to accept the price increase, stop making those products. If you go to your customers and tell them that you are losing money (cash not profits) over these products you will get a sympathetic ear. If customer sees value in this product they will (grudgingly) accept a price increase for these products, especially if you make an effort to take some cost out of the product. If the customers are not taking a price increase then give them 3-6 months (at a higher price) to reformulate, redesign or find equivalent parts elsewhere. Never cut off a customer with too short a notice. They will remember you and make sure you don’t get new business in the future
Enhance the profitability of low margin products
Once you got rid of (or straightened) the tail, your next step is to improve the profitability of the middle section (section B). By looking at raw materials reformulation, using cheaper alternatives, or finding alternate suppliers you can improve profitability. Some targeted and reasonable price increases, while difficult, are not impossible to get. Next review the yield/defect rates for these parts and work with quality and manufacturing functions to improve yields for low yield products. Often the low profitability is due to high labor costs or high raw material costs.
Disproportionate resources for high margin products
Disproportionate resources for high margin products
Once you have
addressed the low margin and negative margin products you are left with mostly
products that show good margin growth with increasing
volume. Your goal is to
try to grow
business by targeting customers and regions where we have low share
for these products compared to elsewhere
in the market. Invest disproportionate sales and marketing
resources in selling these products for the low share customers and regions.
The more you sell
these products with high profitability,
the more variable margin you will
generate.
This results in better fixed
cost absorption and improved gross margin.
An example
case study
Let’s take the above example and implement the steps describe
above. First we look at section C. Let’s say we were not able to raise those
prices sufficiently and decided to stop making the two products: ‘prod5’ and ‘prod6. We then
look at products in section B and successfully raise the price by 5%. In the
near term we leave the highly profitable products in section A as they are. The
net results of these changes are shown in the Table 3 below.
Table 3:
product data after pricing actions
The impact on variable margin is dramatic. The cumulative
variable margin increases from 18,700 to 23,875 an increase of 27% with only a
single price increase of 5% and eliminating the negative margin products. The
higher margin is coming from 21.5% lower volume. This lower volume would also
mean the business needs less cash to operate due to lower inventory and
receivables and generates more margin. What’s
not to like?! The new profitability curve is shown in Fig. 2:
![]() |
| Figure 2: Improved profitability curve |
Profitability is the number one measure of the health of an enterprise. Businesses that have low profitability cannot attract capital, are often working capital intensive, and do not generate enough margin to justify future investments in plant, technology and process improvement. A simple methodology is presented that calculates product profitability,
- .
Raise prices or stop selling negative variable margin
products.
- . Improve profitability of low margin products through a combination of raw material cost reduction, improved yield and price adjustments.
- . Invest disproportionate resources in promoting and selling high margin products in customers and regions where you have low share.
The results can be
quite dramatic and lead to significant improvement in profitability. Thus for the
same receivables and inventory you generate disproportionate cash allowing you
to pay down debt and invest in your business. Ultimately it results in sound
sleep for the owner and job security for the employees.
*******************************************************
*******************************************************
Profitability
basics
Those who don't have a financial or business background below I have defined some terms and lay out the basic math of profitability.
The profitability of a manufacturing operation at the plant or
site level is measured as the gross margin in the Income Statement. It is
defined by.
Gross Margin = Volume x (Unit Price – Raw material cost –
variable labor) – (Fixed labor + Depreciation + fixed manufacturing costs).
If we group the terms together:
Gross Margin =( Volume x Price – Volume x variable cost) –
Fixed cost
The first term in the right is often referred to as ‘variable
margin,’ ‘margin spread’ or ‘contribution margin’. We will abbreviate it as “VM”.
Gross Margin = Variable Margin – Fixed costs
Glossary
Volume
|
Number
of Units Produced
|
Price
|
Net Price per unit
after rebates and discounts
|
Revenue
|
Volume x Price
|
Raw
Material Costs
|
Variable cost per
unit of raw materials used
|
Labor hours per unit
x labor cost/hr * (1+benefit rate)
|
|
Fixed
labor
|
Fully burdened
Variable labor labor costs including
ovhd labor, supervision
|
Fixed
Plant cost
|
Plant utilities,
insurance, maintenance cost and labor etc.
|






No comments:
Post a Comment